Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Gove plan 'risks making exam system worse'

 

Thursday 27 September 2012 05:34 EDT
Comments
Dr Tim Leunig will now assist Mr Gove in his reforms of the education system
Dr Tim Leunig will now assist Mr Gove in his reforms of the education system

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Michael Gove's reforms to GCSEs and A-levels will amount to nothing more than "houses built on sand" if he fails to tackle the deep failings in the way exams are marked and grades awarded, top independent schools have warned the Education Secretary.

The heads lambasted "shocking" marking standards as it emerged they have led to tens of thousands of pupils getting the wrong grades in both GCSE and A-level exams.

Up to 150,000 pupils – one in four – receive the wrong GCSE grades every year because of shoddy marking by examiners, a report by the Headmasters' and Headmistresses' Conference (HMC), which represents many of the country's most elite independent schools, revealed.

Heads warned that Mr Gove's move to make just one exam board responsible for each core subject area may even exacerbate the situation.

One head, Christopher Ray, high master of Manchester Grammar School and chairman of the HMC, said: "The only device many of us have is to say to boards if we don't like their service: 'We'll move somewhere else.' If there is nowhere else to move, that market pressure goes. The perceived arrogance and complacency of the awarding bodies becomes worse because it is a monopoly."

Poor-quality marking coupled with "inexplicable inconsistencies" over awarding of grades has also led to fewer teachers having confidence in the exam system, the HMC added. Last night heads joined forces to decry what they described as an exam system "in deterioration and decay".

Mr Ray said: "The state of the examinations industry is truly shocking and is clearly no longer fit for purpose. The problems go far deeper than this year's disastrous mishandling of the English language GCSE grades." John Claughton, chief master of King Edward's Boys' School in Birmingham, which has regularly topped exam-performance tables, said: "The vast majority of heads bite their lips and put up with it. I think it has probably got worse in the past decade – particularly at A-level."

The report also criticises exam boards for adopting "a culture of secrecy" over faults and says Ofqual has not paid enough attention to the problem.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in