Former NOTW executives hit back at James Murdoch's hacking denial
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.James Murdoch tried to escape blame yesterday for his company's cover-up of phone hacking – but at the cost of his corporate credibility. He was forced to depict himself as an out-of-touch executive chairman who knew and cared little about the criminal culture that has cost News International tens of millions of pounds and its parent company the £7.5bn takeover of BSkyB.
Mr Murdoch sought to blame his trusted legal adviser and the News of the World editor for failing to tell him about evidence showing that the illegal practice was widespread. But within hours of his ordeal in Parliament, both men flatly contradicted his account.
It was also claimed he had misled MPs by telling them he "didn't think" NI had admitted liability for computer or email hacking – despite NOTW barrister Michael Silverleaf admitting as much at a High Court hearing this summer.
Mr Murdoch was appearing for the second time before the House of Commons select committee investigating phone hacking. He told MPs that NI's long-serving legal head, Tom Crone, and the NOTW's last editor, Colin Myler, had misled him.
He repeatedly said he was not made aware of the contents of a key email that led to an unprecedented damages payment for hacking – nor had he asked to see his company's own legal advice that concluded there was "a culture of illegal information access to produce stories for publication".
The committee's new report on the culture inside the NOTW will now be a judgement on a vicious blame game that has been played out between Mr Murdoch and his key lieutenants. Last night John Whittingdale, the committee's chairman, admitted the choice was now who to believe. "It is plain that of the two accounts we've heard, one of them cannot be true."
Mr Crone's reply was dispatched at 6pm. He said it was "regrettable" that Mr Murdoch had "felt the need to discredit Colin Myler and myself. The simple truth is that he was told by us in 2008 about the damning email and what it meant in terms of wider NOTW involvement." He described Mr Murdoch's explanations as "disingenuous" and insisted he had not misled MPs. Mr Myler also challenged Mr Murdoch's evidence, saying: "I stand by my account of the meeting with James Murdoch on 10 June 2008. These issues are now the subject of a police investigation...I have every confidence that they will establish the truth."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments