Firms paid more to bosses than in taxes, says report
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A new study into the accounting machinations of corporate America claims that 25 of its largest companies paid more to their chief executives last year than they paid in taxes.
After examining the financial filings of 100 of the country's biggest publicly traded companies, the Institute for Policy Studies said yesterday that a quarter of them had lavished more on the boss while exploiting a maze of policies to claim tax credits.
Many are household names such as Boeing, eBay, Verizon and Bank of New York Mellon. The latter paid its top executive, Robert Kelly, $19.4m (£12m) in 2010, but secured a $670m tax benefit. At Cablevision, James Dolan pocketed $13.2m while it received a tax benefit of $131m. Company officials said they still expected to pay a small amount of cash taxes.
"We have no evidence that CEOs are fashioning, with their executive leadership, more effective and efficient enterprises," the study said. "On the other hand, ample evidence suggests CEOs and their corporations are expending considerably more energy on avoiding taxes than perhaps ever before – at a time when the federal government needs more revenue to maintain basic services for the American people."
The report will add fuel to the already raging debate about wealth inequality in America and sap credibility from the corporate captains who complain – with Republican encouragement – that US corporate-tax rates are too high.
Some of the companies named in the report have criticised its methodology, noting, for instance, that companies can negotiate tax refunds for one year on condition that they pay what they would have owed in future years. The financial data in the report was taken from the companies' regulatory filings, which can differ from tax returns.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments