Simon Calder: Why fear of flyingis so illogical
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.You may not even have noticed the news story tucked into a few column inches last Saturday, headlined "53 dead as plane crashes at airport". A Hewa Bora Airways domestic flight from Kinshasa, the capital of the Democratic Republic of Congo, came down in poor weather in Kisangani; the death toll later increased to 74.
Someone who did take note was a man who had, within the previous two weeks, flown twice on the same Boeing 727 to and from the same airport: Tony Wheeler, co-founder of Lonely Planet. He has just returned from the country abbreviated to DR Congo after a trip to see the Nyiragongo volcano, which necessitated flying across the country.
"How did I feel when I heard the news of the crash? Definitely an 'oh s***' moment," he says. The crash, "after a very bad time that day", according to the airline's statement, reflects the grisly reality that the poorer a nation, the higher the risks of travel.
Hewa Bora is Swahili for "good wind". The airline is one of 32 DRC "air carriers subject to an operating ban" in the European Union; others on the blacklist include Busy Bee Congo and the Safe Air Company, whose very name is a hostage to fortune. But you are most unlikely to find yourself travelling aboard any of these airlines. Indeed, if you plan to fly this summer on a jet belonging to a UK or Irish carrier, you are choosing the very safest form of transport.
To adopt the concept used on building sites, there have been 8,224 days since the last fatal air accident in Britain – the 1989 Kegworth disaster involving a British Midland Boeing 737.
In contrast, there have been no days since the last fatal road accident in the British Isles; every year, the death toll is equivalent of 10 fully loaded jumbo jets. Yet many more people are fearful of flying than they are of driving. So what's going on? "Feelings and emotions dominate, rather than the statistics about the risk per mile or per journey," says Professor David Spiegelhalter of Cambridge University. As Winton Professor of the Public Understanding of Risk, he is immersed in how you and I assess the dangers of daily life, and going on holiday.
"Some people are just frightened by the whole idea of flying. A lot of this is influenced by fears of lack of control: people would rather drive than fly although the risks are enormously higher.
'taking risks is
PART OF HOLIDAYS'
Does Professor Spiegelhalter, the man who monitors how well travellers deploy common sense, ever put the probabilities to one side? "Yes. I'm one of those middle-aged people who goes skiing and I'm not very good. I probably take more risks in a week's skiing then I do for the rest of the year in terms of bodily injury."
But, he says, there is reason to his apparently irrational behaviour. "I terrified myself once doing tandem paragliding off a mountain – but it was just so exciting. It's crazy to be reckless, but taking some risks after a bit of consideration is part of life and, particularly, part of holidays.
"Given our boring old lives during the year I'm not surprised that people go out and do slightly outrageous things when they're on holiday. And they remember them."
putting danger
into persPECTIVE
Perhaps a short tutorial in risk may persuade you to pay a premium for safety. The "micromort" is a measure that represents a one-in-a-million chance of dying. You can drive about 250 miles for each micromort. When walking or cycling that falls to about 17 miles. The riskiest means of transport is brutally clear: you can go only six miles on a motorbike for a one-in-a-million risk of a fatal accident. In contrast, you can travel for many thousands of miles by air or train.
"I go out of my way to avoid travelling by car, because I know the risks per mile are so much higher than rail," says Professor Spiegelhalter. "No passengers been killed on a moving train since February 2007. They are staggeringly safe, But people don't feel that way. One problem is when there is an accident on a train, very occasionally, it gets enormous publicity. The rarer things become, the more coverage they get when they happen."
To read Tony Wheeler's account of travels in DR Congo (written before the Hewa Bora Airways crash), see www.bit.ly/TonyCongo
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments