Book critics vie for Hatchet Job of the Year award

Wednesday 09 January 2013 06:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

They might be much-lauded grandees of the literary world, but Martin Amis, Salman Rushdie and Naomi Wolf were all gleefully cut down to size by acid-tongued reviewers last year. The critics responsible are now vying for their own honour: that of Hatchet Job of the Year.

The shortlist for this year's prize was revealed yesterday, with some of the most scathing book reviews of 2012 up for the coveted golden hatchet – and a jar of potted shrimp.

Among them was Ron Charles who took aim at Martin Amis in The Washington Post for his "ham fisted" novel Lionel Asbo. The American writer accused Amis of "serving up blanched stereotypes on a silver platter" adding the work "has the grating tone of an episode of The Beverly Hillbillies sketched on the back of an envelope".

Zoe Heller is in the running for her take on Salman Rushdie's memoir Joseph Anton. She hauled Rushdie over the coals saying readers should not worry if the book made the world smaller and grimmer. "The world is as large and as wide as it ever was; it's just Rushdie who got small."

Vagina: A New Biography came in for sustained criticism upon its publication, but Suzanne Moore perhaps landed the finest blows on author Naomi Wolf. "So much of Wolf's work," Moore said, "is utter drivel".

The Omnivore, a website that rounds up reviews, set up the prize last year for the "writer of the angriest, funniest, most trenchant book review of the past 12 months".

Adam Mars-Jones won the inaugural award for his scathing review of Pulitzer Prize-winning Michael Cunningham's novel By Nightfall.

Fleur MacDonald, editor of The Omnivore, said there had been a huge response to the first award. "While much was positive, a few people were po-faced and argued there should be a prize for positive criticism. But where would the fun be in that?"

The eight-strong shortlist also includes Craig Brown's review of Richard Bradford's The Odd Couple, which he called a "triumph of cut and paste" while Richard Evans called AN Wilson's Hitler: A Short Biography a "travesty". Other nominees are Claire Harman on Andrew Motion's Treasure Island ("Yo ho ho hum"), Camilla Long on Aftermath by Rachel Cusk ("acres of poetic whimsy and vague literary blah") and Allan Massie on Craig Raine's The Divine Comedy ("The first page is actually dreadful").

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in