Santander UK fined £1.5m by the City watchdog
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The City watchdog has fined Santander UK £1.5m for failing to make it clear to investors who bought its structured investment products whether they were covered by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme.
The bank sold £2.7bn worth of the investments, which generally offer superior returns based on the increase in value of underlying assets such as the stock market, property or bonds.
The FSA said yesterday that although Santander received queries from its customers asking if they were covered by the compensation scheme following the financial crisis in 2008 it did not clarify the position until 2010.
That meant literature was potentially misleading and staff at the UK bank had not been fully briefed as to what they could say to potential investors. During that time Santander sold 178,000 of this type of investment and significantly, the FSA said, it sold £1.2bn after June 2009, when it had concluded the cover for two products, Guaranteed Capital Plus and the Guaranteed Growth Plan, was limited.
The FSA said there had been no mis-selling and no one had lost money. But Tracey McDermott, pictured, acting director of enforcement, added: "Considering that sales of these products took place between 2008 and 2009, a time of financial uncertainty, Santander should have moved more quickly to confirm under which circumstances FSCS cover would be available."
The bank said: "Santander is disappointed with the outcome and has registered its opposition to the FSA's findings. but we will not challenge the decision or the fine."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments