Row over Bechtel bid for £6.1bn nuclear clean-up

 

Monday 17 December 2012 06:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Union leaders are calling on the Government to block an engineering giant from bidding for a £6.1bn nuclear waste contract following alleged "serious lapses" of security and safety in the US.

San Francisco-based Bechtel, which managed the construction of the High Speed rail link between London and the Channel Tunnel, suffered high-profile embarrassments on two of its nuclear projects over the summer.

In July, three nuclear protesters – led by 82-year-old Catholic nun Megan Rice – infiltrated the Y-12 National Security Complex in Tennessee, which enriched the uranium used in the Hiroshima bomb. The protesters splashed the walls with human blood.

Bechtel co-manages the facility, though security is mainly provided by a division of G4S, the UK-based group which so spectacularly failed to provide enough guards for the London Olympics that very same month.

At the Hanford Nuclear Reservation in Washington state, where Bechtel is the clean-up contractor, the group was accused of 34 failings in a leaked memo from the Department of Energy's engineering director on the project. Gary Brunson said that Bechtel was "not competent to complete" its role working on a $12.3bn facility at America's most contaminated nuclear site. Two months later, Bechtel was awarded only half its maximum potential contracting fee for Hanford, after the energy departments awarded it a string of poor marks against its performance criteria.

However, Bechtel is in the running for the UK contract to decontaminate 12 nuclear sites, nine of which are Magnox stations that are obsolete in the rest of the world. Most of the bid teams are understood to be major US engineers, as they typically have the greatest experience in this type of decommissioning work.

Gary Smith, the GMB union's national secretary for energy and utilities, said: "It's absolutely inconceivable that the Government can award Magnox contracts to Bechtel after these incidents in the US. The most important things are safety and security and these look like very serious lapses by Bechtel."

An infrastructure industry source said that it was an "absolute joke" that Bechtel should be allowed to bid for Magnox in light of its recent record. The company has worked in the UK on major projects for 60 years.

A spokesman for Bechtel, which is led by billionaire Riley Bechtel, said: "During our 12 years at the Y-12 National Security Complex, our focus on delivering safe, effective, and efficient management and operations has been positively recognised by the US government… and is fully engaged with the Department of Energy regarding a recent security incident involving three anti-nuclear protesters.

"The issues in the [Hanford] memo are not new—in fact, Bechtel identified many of the issues and Bechtel is actively working with DOE to resolve them. As a company and as individuals, safety is our priority."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in