Outlook: How to boost Britain's statis housing market

David Prosser
Wednesday 24 August 2011 05:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The good news, says the housebuilder Persimmon, is that Britain's housing market has stabilised. But, it warns, there is not much reason to be optimistic about the chances of an upturn because mortgage availability remains such a problem – the right kind of mortgage that is.

Over at the British Bankers' Association (BBA), the story is a little different. Yes, mortgage lending was static again last month, the BBA says, but with the cost of home loans now at record lows, it is a lack of demand, rather than supply, that isto blame.

How then to reconcile these apparently contradictory statements? Well, here's the problem: while mortgage lenders have cut their rates – both fixed and variable – and made more funds available, the number of products at 95 per cent loan to value (LTV) or more remains tiny.

That is the issue for the first-time buyers: it is not that they are being turned down for mortgages, but that they do not have the deposits required to borrow.

In other words, demand is low because supply of the right kind of mortgage is still constrained. There isn't much prospect of that difficulty being overcome any time soon.

The BBA's latest figures show that savers were able to put by only half as much last month as they managed in July 2010. And if it is getting harder to save for a deposit on a home, lenders, still running scared of bad debt, are not inclined to begin offering greater numbers of high LTV products.

Persimmon is frustrated, for it believes there is a big pool of would-be first-time buyers out there, many of whom would be perfectly capable of staying on top of mortgage repayments if only they could scrape together sufficient deposit to qualify for a loan in the first place. The logjam at the bottom is a problem for everyone else in the market too, of course – while many of those who would like to move home have sufficient equity in their properties not to have to worry about high LTV requirements, movers depend on there being a supply of first-time buyers at the bottom of the chain.

It would be interesting to hear more from regulators on this matter. The new Financial Policy Committee (FPC), charged with monitoring serious systemic economic and financial risk, is likely to have the power to require minimum LTVs in the event it gets concerned about a housing-market bubble.

However, Andrew Haldane, a Bank of England official who sits on the FPC, said last week that it ought also to consider supporting credit growth during difficult times for the economy. Could that be the key to starting to help more people into the housing market?

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in