G4S to axe 1,100 jobs
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The G4S chief executive Nick Buckles conceded for the first time yesterday that his job was at risk in the wake of the Olympic security debacle that cost the company £50m.
While some shareholders have publicly backed him in the wake of the fiasco, citing his track record, the views of the G4S chairman John Connolly are less clear.
Mr Connolly joined the board only in June and is said by some to have been alarmed at how quickly the Olympics issues spiralled out of control. An internal review headed by Mr Connolly will report back in a few weeks' time.
The Olympics issue aside, the half-year results were reasonably strong. Revenues were up 5.8 per cent to £3.9bn, while profit was dead flat at £236m.
The £50m figure for the Olympics is at the top end of the company's estimated losses for failing to recruit enough of the guards it had promised for the event.
In an attempt to save £30m and to recoup these losses, it will axe 1,100 jobs, of which 100 are in the UK.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments