'Fred Goodwin Law' to ban disgraced bankers for life
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A "Fred Goodwin Law" making it easier to ban the bosses of failed banks from the City could be on the statute books by January.
Following the abject failure of UK law and prosecutors to jail any bankers for wrongdoing over the financial crisis, the Financial Services Authority said before Christmas that the current legal framework was inadequate to bring sufficient actions against directors responsible for mismanaging their banks.
The Treasury yesterday published a consultation document proposing rules that could prevent directors of failed banks from ever holding senior positions in finance again.
Key to the reform would be changing the system so directors of collapsed banks have to prove their suitability for office to the Financial Services Authority – a 180-degree shift in the burden of proof. Currently, the regulator has to prove the individual acted improperly before banning them, but now directors will have to prove they acted properly and were not responsible for the failure.
Second, the Treasury proposes creating a new criminal offence covering serious mismanagement in bank management. This would go some way toward dealing with the loophole in the law that makes it difficult to prosecute through the narrow crimes of fraud, insider dealing and making misleading statements.
The consultation suggests negligence, incompetence and recklessness could be made offences under the umbrella of "managerial misconduct". Recklessness would almost certainly have been usable in the case of Goodwin, below, at Royal Bank of Scotland. It would be particularly used to cover excessive risk taking and "the sort of irresponsible conduct that could put a bank's survival at risk and potentially put the taxpayer at risk also," the Treasury said.
The initial consultation started yesterday with responses due by 30 September. The hope is to get the new rules included in the Banking Reform Bill aimed at ringfencing retail banks from investment banks.
Many of the proposals in the upcoming Banking Reform Bill are based on the findings of the Vickers report into the banking crash of 2008.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments