Barclays faces High Court claim over rate-fix scandal
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Barclays became the first British bank to face a legal claim for damages arising out of the Libor scandal after a High Court judge ruled yesterday that a claim brought against the bank by Guardian Care Homes (GCH) must go to a full trial.
The decision by Mr Justice Julian Flaux is set to lead to a test case for how courts will decide on swap mis-selling and Libor-rigging cases. Gary Hartland, boss of the care homes group, called the decision a "huge milestone" in his £38m battle against the banking giant.
"Mine is a small care home operator, and these products along with the conduct of Barclays throughout this process have had a hugely distressing impact on our staff and residents," Mr Hartland said.
"Today is a huge milestone with a trial now going forward to determine whether these financial products should be declared void. Our claim is not just based on mis-selling but on the effect of senior management at Barclays instructing the aggressive selling of swaps while attempting to rig Libor."
But Barclays said last night that it will fight GCH, owned by Graiseley Properties and Graiseley Investments, all the way. The bank said: "This business had a suite of advisers and a lot of financial experience and skill in-house, and entered into their swaps with sufficient understanding to exercise their own judgement as to whether the products would meet its business objectives. We do not believe the case has merit and will defend it."
The bank also pointed out that GCH owes Barclays £70m. The case revolves around loan and finance deals between Barclays and GCH dating to 2007 and 2008 when the care homes group took out two multi-million-pound interest-rate hedges, known as swaps.
In June, the Financial Services Authority reported "serious failings" in the sale of swaps. Meanwhile, several banks were found guilty of attempting to manipulate the key interbank interest rate Libor, including Barclays. However, the bank's fine related to dollar-libor and euro-libor rates while GCH's swaps were linked to sterling-libor. The bank will argue that its attempted manipulation had no bearing on its arrangement with GCH.
Thousands of small firms were sold swaps by as a hedge against rising interest rates but fell foul of the deals when rates sank to record lows, sending interest repayments soaring.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments