Bailout fund is 'robust' but pensions still at risk
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Britain's pension bailout fund will warn today that the country's economic problems are pushing more pension schemes to the limit.
The Pension Protection Fund (PPF), which protects the pensions of employees when companies go bankrupt, will insist that its funding position is "robust". But its chief executive, Alan Rubenstein, conceded last night that levies on existing pension schemes will have to rise if it is to be self-sufficient by 2030.
The PPF will publish its accounts today showing that at the end of March this year it had a £1.07bn surplus over liabilities, up almost £391m on the previous year. Membership increased to 128,000 people, and it was managing £11.1bn of assets, a rise of £4.7bn from 2010-11. The PPF will also hail a 25 per cent return on its investments.
But pension experts warn that the figures could be misleading. The independent consultant John Ralfe said liabilities also increased by 22 per cent, and the 3 percentage point net return had been driven by low interest rates and could evaporate when they started to rise again. He also highlighted fund management fees which doubled from £26m to £53m.
"To consider the PPF's overall health at April 2012 we should compare £17.3bn assets with £16.2bn liabilities, a funding ratio of 107 per cent, unchanged from 2011," he said. "So the PPF's overall funding is unchanged over the year. No worse, but no better either.
"Looking at performance this year, is the £600m charged by the 2012 levy enough to pay for the deficits in the new schemes taken on by the PPF during the year? New schemes taken on had £3.7bn liabilities against £2.5bn assets, so a £1.2bn deficit during the year. This is exactly double the £600m annual levy for the year," he warned.
Mr Rubenstein said: "If we are to hit our long-term funding target, levies will have to rise. We have said that at moment we can afford to give companies some breathing room and not increase fees. But 2013-14 levies will increase if we are to stay at current levels and have a properly funded PPF, but equally, if economic growth returns and markets perform well, then deficits will shrink, which will mean our liability exposure will fall commensurately."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments