Fashion: When Karl met Zaha

Rhiannon Harries
Saturday 05 July 2008 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Designers have always loved a highbrow reference when waxing lyrical about their collections, but these days the fashion world seems locked in a battle of art appreciation one-upmanship.

The trend was all over this summer's catwalks – witness Dolce & Gabbana's Pollock-esque paint spatter, Chloé's bold brushstokes and whimsical illustrations at Prada – but those truly pushing their art-loving status are taking things further.

Karl Lagerfeld, for instance, has commissioned architect du jour Zaha Hadid to create a mobile art pavilion for Chanel. A mini-gallery housing a giant handbag (well, a travelling museum holding Sylvie Fleury's outsized model of the iconic 2.55 bag), it is full of pieces by young artists inspired by that most fertile subject, the, er, Chanel handbag. Marc Jacobs, meanwhile, recruited Richard Prince to make his mark on the classic Louis Vuitton bag, cannily ensuring a commercial hit with creative cachet.

The good old-fashioned patronage we've come to expect from the world of couture also continues, with the famously low-key Parisian designer Agnès B backing a Mike Figgis video installation at Somerset House this month. And the Prada Art Foundation, which has quietly supported emerging talent for 15 years, has recently unveiled plans for a €25m Rem Koolhaas-designed Milan headquarters.

But why are all these designers suddenly feeling a need to adopt an artist? Do we detect a sense of inadequacy here? Dolce & Gabanna's summer collection was, it says, "an homage to modern art and its endless experimentation with materials, colours and ideas". Isn't that what fashion is supposed to be about, anyway?

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in