Computers Feedback: Legal actions stack up
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.LAWSUIT of the week was won by Stac Electronics against the giant Microsoft. Stac makes Stacker, the most successful of the many programs which appear to increase the size of a hard disk by compressing files invisibly and automatically as they are stored there and then expanding them again when they are needed.
In 1992 Microsoft investigated the possibility of licensing Stacker, but decided instead to incorporate a rival product, Doublespace, into the next version of its operating system, MS-Dos 6. A federal judge in Los Angeles last week found that the giant Microsoft had infringed two Stac patents. The decision has cost Microsoft dollars 120m and could lead to chaos. Doublespace has been removed from all copies of the latest version of MS-Dos 6 in the US, but in this country MS-Dos 6.2 is still being sold with disk compression.
To add to the confusion Microsoft was awarded damages of dollars 13m against Stac after Stac successfully 'reverse engineered' MS-Dos 6 to make Stacker work with it. That judgement has sent a rush of fear through all the manufacturers of add-on bits for Microsoft operating systems, since if they cannot legally discover how Microsoft products work, they cannot guarantee that their own will work with them.