bridge

Alan Hiron
Thursday 27 June 1996 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

You would expect a player in a vulnerable grand slam to take more care than usual. Perhaps the chance of winning a huge rubber induced South to take his eye off the ball.

South opened 1NT (16-18 points) and North launched a Gerber enquiry with 42. The reply of 4! showed one ace and North's 52 apparently asked for kings (though how he could now play in 52 if that were the right contract is a mystery to me). The 5NT reply (three kings) was joy to hear, and North plunged to 7NT.

The lead of 410 did declarer no harm and he could now see 12 top tricks. After winning with the jack, however, he immediately tested the hearts. The fact that the jack did not fall in three rounds was a minor irritant - there were still many chances - but he realised belatedly that he had no good discard from hand. You've guessed it: he parted with a diamond, leaving only his original 12 tricks.

Before tackling the hearts, South should have tested a minor, it did not matter which. If he had selected diamonds, he could have claimed at trick four. If he had chosen clubs, he would have found the 4-2 division and, after cashing his spades, could part with what was now known to be a losing club on the third heart.

Yes, there were undoubtedly squeeze possibilities, but this seems a nice, simple approach and declarer's actual play led to certain defeat as the cards lay.

N-S game; dealer South

North

47 5

!A K 10 9 5

#A Q 9

2A Q 7

West East

410 9 8 3 4Q 6 4 2

!7 6 !J 8 4 2

#J 6 5 #10 8 3

2J 10 4 3 28 6

South

4A K J

!Q 3

#K 7 4 2

2K 9 5 2

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in