Concerns over wolf hunting as Biden administration backs Trump policy on lifting protections
States have modified hunting policies, loosening rules that ultimately cost more wolves’ lives
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.To the dismay of wildlife officials, President Joe Biden will uphold former President Trump’s decision to do away with gray wolf protections throughout the US.
Gary Frazer, the US Fish and Wildlife Service Assistant Director for Ecological Services, told the Associated Press that the decision raises concerns.
With no federal protections in place, states have modified hunting policies, loosening rules that ultimately cost more wolves’ lives. Idaho lets hunters shoot wolves from parachutes ATVs or snowmobiles, for example. Mr Frazer worries that rampant hunting will lead to a rapid decline in population and eventual extinction.
When President Biden entered office, he pledged to review Mr Trump’s decision to remove protections of gray wolves. Wildlife advocates filed a lawsuit, seeking to gain protections that the Trump administration stripped away, but Mr Biden’s attorney’s rejected the lawsuit.
With huntings and trappings, wolves were reaching the brink of extinction in the early 1900s. But federal protection allowed the wolf population to grow.
Tim Preso, the attorney who filed the lawsuit, said other states’ relaxed hunting laws will lead to a dwindling gray wolf population. “Why should we hammer the population back down and lose all the gains that have been made before any kind of remedial action?” Mr Preso told the AP.
Those not in favour of the federal protection say states should be allowed to create and enforce their own hunting rules.
As states loosen hunting rules with no federal protection, there are discrepancies between wildlife officials and local governing bodies on how many wolves should be allowed to be hunted. In Wisconsin, for example, a Republican board said the fall quota for hunting gray wolves was 300 even though wildlife officials recommended 130.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments