Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Descriptions of new species in research can help traffickers find them

A Vietnamese orchid, turtles on an Indonesian island and a gecko discovered in China are some of the species that have been targeted after sightings were detailed online

Louise Boyle
New York
Monday 01 June 2020 10:28 EDT
Comments
The WHO and governments globally are facing pleas to halt the sale of animals in unhygienic conditions and wildlife trade

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Scientific research that heralds the discovery of new species can have an unintended but potentially devastating consequence: providing a roadmap for wildlife traffickers.

A new study from a group of international academics has found that as research becomes more publicly available online, poachers have pounced on the information to boost their trade.

The impacts have already been felt. A newly-discovered orchid in Vietnam had its population decimated less than a year after a photo of the species appeared on social media. It was dubbed “extinction at the speed of the internet”, by a letter-writer in the journal Science.

Research work that described a new turtle on a remote island in Indonesia, and a gecko in southeastern China, turned them into novelties in the international pet trade. The animals fetched prices of up to $2,000 (£1,600) and the trade drove them towards extinction.

There is now debate as to whether scientists should be asked to hold back descriptions of creatures and their locations, including geographic coordinates, in their work. The International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) stores nonpublic maps of some endangered species threatened by trade, one of the study’s co-authors, Catherine Workman, wrote this week.

While some scientists already withhold detailed information and only share it following specific requests, others continue to publish extensive details in the pursuit of academic rigour.

The study, published last month in the scientific journal Conservation Letters, found that describing species was one of the top 20 issues contributing to the illegal wildlife trade.

A 2019 paper also highlighted the risks that readily available location information can have on conservation and proposed employing so-called “geo-indistinguishability” – protecting a user’s exact location – to guard threatened species.

The other side of the coin is that discoveries of new species can encourage more research, which in turn bolsters conservation efforts. Inspiring public interest in the natural world is also key for conservation agencies to keep up their profiles and often much-needed funding.

The proliferation of open-access data means that research papers are now abundantly available online. According to the Directory of Open Access Journals, about 12,000 journals covering science, technology, medicine, social science and humanities are available today.

The latest paper, led by researchers from Oxford University, suggested a single framework of policies to shield sensitive information from nefarious browsers and make it harder for traffickers to track down new species.

It also suggested conducting market research to address species which are vulnerable and communicating the risks to media and other organisations of unwittingly making species more desirable.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in