UK ‘must invest billions every year’ to meet 2050 net-zero carbon target
Large-scale greenhouse gas removal to offset emissions from aviation, farming and industry
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The UK will have to invest billions of pounds every year in greenhouse gas removal to meet its climate targets, according to a government-commissioned report.
Cutting emissions to net zero by 2050 without significant technological breakthroughs requires “large-scale investment” in industrial carbon capture and storage, the report states.
It would also involve the conversion of large areas of land into forests, and the planting of trees and shrubs among crops by farmers.
The analysis by consultancy firm Vivid Economics suggests greenhouse gas removal (GGR) projects could be funded by government subsidies or tax credits, the evolution of existing policies, or by passing the costs to the suppliers of fossil fuels and agricultural products.
“GGR at scale will require multiple billions of pounds per annum,” the report adds. “Notably, costs are likely to be of a similar scale to current government spending on renewable energy support. Hence, there is precedent for government climate funding at the required scale.”
However, the report warned that tax credits funded by a carbon levy are likely to benefit large corporations while disproportionately affecting low-income households through increased electricity prices.
Government subsidies could rise from around £2bn in 2030 to between £6bn and £20bn a year by 2050, but would be “possibly more effective in quickly establishing GGR deployment at scale, particularly in the short to medium term”.
A third option would involve requiring companies to buy “negative emission certificates” to compensate for a percentage of their emissions.
While this would ensure the polluter pays the costs, it could also cause rises in fuel prices, the report warns.
The report argues that GGR is necessary because of the difficulty in reducing emissions from the “hard to treat” sectors of aviation, farming and heavy industry.
“Even if emissions are reduced aggressively across the economy, the UK is expected to continue to emit a significant amount of greenhouse gases annually,” it says. “This is primarily because some economic processes, which are key to our way of life, are very difficult to decarbonise with current technologies.”
The report suggests a large proportion of UK farmers may have to adopt agroforestry – growing trees and shrubs among crops – and “enhanced weathering”, which removes carbon dioxide by spreading crushed minerals over the land
However, the main method of carbon dioxide removal is expected to involve bioenergy with carbon capture and storage, and direct air carbon capture and storage.
The report adds: “The rate of roll-out will need to be rapid, particularly in the 2030s and 2040s, and will require significant policy support.”
A spokesperson for the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy said they would “look closely” at the report’s findings.
The government’s commitment to end Britain’s contribution to global warming was announced in June by Theresa May.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments