Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Surfers vs the Severn dam

Man who rode a wave to a world record leads opposition to planned barrage across the river

Martin Hodgson
Saturday 22 April 2006 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Surfers come from all over the world to conquer the Severn Bore - a unique wave that powers up the river for miles, creating one of the longest rides for watersports enthusiasts. But now they are furious over plans for a 10-mile "eco-friendly" hydro-electric barrage that will kill the wave for ever.

The surf on the River Severn, which is also home to porpoises, otters, rare fish and an astonishing array of bird life, is under threat after senior government sources signalled that ministers were backing the proposals, which would dramatically reduce the tidal flow of the river. The Government wants to harness the water power generated by 14m tides to supply up to 7 per cent of the UK's electricity demands.

But Steve King, who broke the world record for the longest continuous surf ride on the river earlier this month, reacted with dismay to the news. "The tide is the life blood of the river," he said. "I'm all for alternative energy - but what is the price we're going to pay? The environment here is unique. We are obliged to preserve it."

Peter Hain, the Secretary of State for Wales, told The Independent on Sunday that the barrage should be a priority in the Government's energy review. "This is one of the few renewable schemes that rivals nuclear in terms of the amount of electricity it can generate - but without the associated problems of radioactive waste and security risks," he said.

He said it could help to fill the looming "energy gap" which will emerge as nuclear power stations are gradually decommissioned. "This not just a climate change issue. This debate is about security of supply. It's about keeping the lights on," he added.

The Severn estuary is a harsh landscape of vast mudflats scoured by racing tides, but its unique ecosystem provides ideal conditions for large numbers of migratory birds. Otters, porpoises and rare fish are found in the river, while every winter, hundreds of thousands of waterfowl flock to the area.

The Severn barrage would be the largest project of its kind in the world by far. It would trap water at high tide, which would then be released through hundreds of turbines. The barrage would be fitted with locks to allow shipping upriver, but it would block migratory routes for fish such as salmon and eels, and would substantially reduce the estuary's tidal range.

If the scheme goes ahead, it will irreversibly change the estuarine environment, said Julian Branscombe, the chief executive of Gwent Wildlife Trust. "The barrage would turn the estuary into a vast lake with a slight tidal range. A site of international environmental importance would not just be damaged but destroyed," he said. "Porpoises will no longer visit, and should any of them be trapped inside the estuary when it is closed, they will eventually die out within the impounded waters."

Morgan Parry, the head of WWF Wales, said: "If we're promoting renewable energy in order to protect our environment it would be rather ironic to end up destroying one of the natural wonders of the United Kingdom."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in