England is too different from Scotland to have right for roam, says Labour
Shadow environment secretary Steve Reed said he does not want habitats or crops damaged or ramblers hurt on farming machinery.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Labour will not introduce a right to roam law in England because it has a lot more farmland than Scotland, the shadow environment secretary has said, suggesting that ramblers may hurt themselves by coming across agricultural machinery on their walks.
For the last 20 years, residents north of the border have had a lawful right to access and camp on most land and inland waters provided they follow basic rules, such as not damaging the environment or camping on farmers’ crops.
Campaigners want England to introduce a similar rule and the previous shadow environment secretary Jim McMahon had said Labour would follow their suggestions.
Mr McMahon’s replacement, Steve Reed, said Labour never formally had a right to roam in England policy and cited a need for “responsible access”.
Speaking at a conference organised by the Country Land and Business Association, he said: “The system of what works for Scotland isn’t going to work for England.
“I don’t want farmers to be worried about their valuable crops being damaged, I don’t want ramblers or walkers to be at risk of hurting themselves because they come across potentially dangerous machinery that really, is for those who know how to work it not people just wandering through.
“And I don’t want precious habitats destroyed by accident by people who walk straight through them. So there’s quite a lot of things we need to balance there.”
Steve Barclay, the Government’s environment secretary, also ruled out a right to roam law, also saying there needs to be “responsible access” and that the Government was instead giving £10 million towards protected landscapes and £2.5 million towards improving children’s access.
Mr Reed said his party would be setting out specific policies on improving access to nature in the coming months.
Their comments came after speeches to a crowd of rural landowners in which Mr Reed hailed them as “stewards of our environment and custodians of our countryside” and Mr Barclay said the Conservatives “will always be the party of the countryside”.
Mr Barclay promised to provide more funding for innovation and technology in the farming sector, such as AI, to improve productivity and food security.
His Labour counterpart in turn promised to speed up the planning process so that renewable energy projects can connect to the grid faster and set up publicly-owned Great British Energy which would help lower bills by providing more clean power.
Both politicians are seeking to win over the rural vote ahead of an an upcoming election next year.