Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Scotland not doing enough to tackle climate change despite new target, campaigners say

Tougher emissions target falls short of 100 per cent cut by 2050 supported by experts and environmentalists

Josh Gabbatiss
Science Correspondent
Thursday 24 May 2018 09:01 EDT
Comments
Pipers from the Scottish Power pipe band play at the switch on of Whitelee, Europe's largest onshore windfarm in 2009
Pipers from the Scottish Power pipe band play at the switch on of Whitelee, Europe's largest onshore windfarm in 2009 (Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Scottish government has left environmental campaigners disappointed by failing to commit to a 100 per cent reduction in carbon emissions by 2050.

The country’s new climate change bill has been described as a “missed opportunity” after ministers pledged to introduce a tough new emissions target.

New legislation will commit the country to reducing harmful emissions by 90 per cent by 2050.

Though it is an improvement on the current targets of 80 per cent reductions, experts have warned that a so-called “net-zero” target will be necessary to meet the terms of the Paris climate agreement.

Environmental campaigners have been pressing for a net zero target – which would mean all emissions were balanced by their removal from the atmosphere – to be in the new bill.

However, the Scottish government insisted advice from the UK Committee on Climate Change advisory group shows the new target is “at the limit of feasibility”.

Tom Ballantine, chair of Stop Climate Chaos Scotland, said: “It’s hugely disappointing that the Scottish government has failed to live up to its own rhetoric on global climate change leadership by failing to set a net zero emissions target in the climate change bill published today.”

The Scottish government has “disregarded the voices of over 19,000 people in Scotland who asked for a net zero target by 2050”, he added.

However, Roseanna Cunningham, Scottish environment secretary, insisted Scotland’s legislation would be “tougher” than the 100 per cent targets that have so far been set by a handful of other nations.

She also stressed ministers were committed to achieving “net zero” as soon as possible, with the new law requiring ministers to keep this under review and take expert advice every five years.

Scotland’s original Climate Change Act of 2009 had set targets to cut harmful emissions by 42 per cent by 2020 and 80 per cent by 2050.

As well as requiring a 90 per cent reduction by 2050, the new bill will introduce more challenging interim targets, such as a 56 per cent drop by 2020, a 66 per cent reduction by 2030 rising to 78 per cent by 2040.

Ms Cunningham said: “Our climate change bill sets out our commitment to reduce emissions by 100 per cent with ambitious interim targets which strengthen Scotland’s world-leading position on climate change.”

She added: “Our 90 per cent target will be tougher even than the 100 per cent goal set by a handful of other countries, because our legislation will set more demanding, legally-binding, annual targets covering every sector of our economy.

“By 2030, we will cut emissions by two-thirds and, unlike other nations, we will not use carbon offsetting, where other countries are paid to cut emissions for us, to achieve our goal.”

Mr Ballantine said: “The government claims Scotland will be one of the first countries to achieve zero emissions but the bill does not commit to that. It sets a target of only a 90 per cent reduction in emissions by 2050.

“By failing to ally with the global momentum towards zero emissions, led by countries like France, Sweden and New Zealand, Scotland is missing a huge opportunity to end its contribution to climate change in a generation, attract clean investment and retain its position as a leader on the global stage.

“We’re now calling on MSPs from all parties to push for stronger targets on emissions – net-zero by 2050 at the latest, 77 per cent by 2030 and the action needed to deliver on them in line with the Paris agreement.”

Eight young Floridians file lawsuit against the state of Florida over climate change

Mark Ruskell, climate spokesman for the Scottish Greens, branded the 90 per cent target “timid”.

“This is hugely disappointing and will shock the many thousands of Scots who fed into the government’s consultation, calling for a net-zero target,” he said.

“This timid decision shows how weak the SNP are on the climate crisis. They’re making excuses but they should be seizing the opportunity.

“Science says we need strong action now. Other countries such as New Zealand, Iceland and Sweden have already set net-zero targets in their legislation, thanks to Greens in government.

“Scotland has a chance to drive up improvements in housing, jobs, transport and farming but it seems it’s going to take opposition parties and the wider climate movement to force the SNP to do the right thing.”

A report released in March by scientists at the London School of Economics (LSE) called for an updated UK climate change act that sets a net zero goal.

However, the authors warned that such a target is “not trivial”, and will require the development of technologies such as carbon capture and storage that are still in their early stages.

While the current climate change act has achieved massive cuts in emissions since it was introduced in 2008, the LSE experts warned there was no room for complacency and politicians must bring it up to speed with the goals of the Paris agreement.

Additional reporting by PA.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in