Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Poisoning link threatens future of fracking

US study casts doubt on controversial shale gas extraction process – as Government considers allowing its widespread use here

Tom Bawden
Tuesday 13 December 2011 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Britain's fledgling shale gas industry could be stopped in its tracks after dramatic new evidence established a link for the first time between the "fracking" technology used to dislodge natural gas trapped in rocks and water pollution.

A study by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) into hydraulic fracturing reported finding a host of chemicals in the groundwater around shale gas wells in Wyoming state.

These included petroleum hydrocarbons such as benzene, and tert-butyl alcohol, a fuel additive, which is among the more than 500 chemicals that are typically mixed with sand and water and blasted into shale to fracture the rock and release the gas.

The EPA findings will put further pressure on the UK Government as it considers whether to allow fracking to become commonplace in this country.

The process has been banned in a number of areas, including France, Switzerland and New York state.

The UK's sole operational fracking site, near Blackpool, was suspended in June following complaints from locals about two earthquakes in April and May. The subsequent report into the seismic activity and fracking concluded last month that it is "highly probable" that there was a connection.

Furthermore, the report established that the fracking activity – by Cuadrilla Resources, a company backed by the former BP chief executive Lord Browne of Madingley – was responsible for a further 48 earthquakes.

The Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) is reviewing the report into the Blackpool earthquakes before deciding whether to allow the Cuadrilla site – at Preese Hall in Lancashire – to reopen and other sites to begin fracking.

A DECC spokesman said: "No decision on the resumption of these hydraulic fracture operations will be made until the implications of this [Cuadrilla earthquake] report, and of any further analysis which may prove necessary, has been fully considered."

DECC is expected to decide whether to allow fracking to proceed in the UK early next year.

Commenting on the EPA report, Caroline Lucas, MP for Brighton Pavillion and leader of the Green Party, said: "The Government should halt operations until we have a thorough and fully independent investigation into the environmental and health impacts of fracking."

Although the report into fracking in the town of Pavillion, Wyoming, was unable to definitively prove the link between the controversial process and water pollution, it concluded "detection of high concentrations of benzene, xylenes... in ground water samples from shallow monitoring wells near pits indicates that pits are a source of shallow ground water contamination in the area of investigation".

Encana, Canada's largest gas company and owner of 123 wells in Pavillion, dismissed the EPA report as "not a definitive conclusion".

For its part, the EPA acknowledged that fracking conditions differ from area to area, with issues such as the depth of activity and proximity to aquifer's affecting the chance of possible pollution.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in