Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

'Nastiest landlord' Hoogstraten defies law over £15,000 unpaid footpath fines

Robert Mendick
Saturday 01 September 2001 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Embarrassed ministers are promising to investigate why tens of thousands of pounds in fines remain unpaid over a blocked, public right-of-way that has become a cause célèbre for ramblers.

The row is based on a footpath at Framfield, near Uckfield, East Sussex, owned by Nicholas van Hoogstraten, a multi-millionaire who is described as "the nastiest slum landlord of the post-Rachman era".

Despite the new Countryside and Rights of Way Act and a test court case earlier this year, the path is still blocked and £15,000 in fines remain unpaid.

Van Hoogstraten has barricaded the path for about 10 years. Ironically, as the largest foreign landowner in Zimbabwe, he is a vocal supporter of President Mugabe's land seizure programme.

The new legislation, which was prompted by Hoogstraten's footpath protest, gives magistrates power to remove pathway obstacles and fine landowners .

Lewes magistrates fined Rarebargain, one of van Hoogstraten's former companies, to whom the land is registered, the maximum £15,000 and ordered that the obstacles should be removed.

A court hearing is this month due to demand Rarebargain pay further fines of about £50,000 for ignoring the court's rulings.

Kate Ashbrook, general-secretary of the Open Spaces Society, has asked Alun Michael, rural affairs minister, to investigate the footpath dilemma. Meanwhile, East Sussex County Council, which has received more than 2,000 objections to the blocked footpath from residents, has proposed a new route avoiding the obstacles.

A public inquiry will now decide the outcome of the path dispute.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in