Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Average person consumes up to 120,000 particles of microplastics every year

Study looked at plastic particles in fish, shellfish, added sugars, salts, alcohol, water and air

Phoebe Weston
Science Correspondent
Wednesday 05 June 2019 11:59 EDT
Comments
Plastic Oceans International explains what Microplastics are

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The average person eats and breathes in up to 120,000 particles of microplastics each year, a study has found.

The health effects of ingesting these particles are still unknown but some pieces are small enough to enter human tissues where they could potentially trigger immune reactions or release toxic substances.

Researchers estimated that the average person consumes between 74,000 to 121,000 microplastic particles every year depending on age and sex. People who drink only bottled water could consume an additional 90,000 microplastics annually.

This is probably a conservative estimation, according to the paper published in the journal Environmental Science & Technology.

The research, led by Dr Kieran Cox from the University of Victoria is the first study to estimate human ingestion of plastic.

Since the mass production of plastics started in the 1940s, these versatile polymers have spread all over the world and disposing of them has become a growing problem. Microplastics are caused when large plastic products degrade in the environment or flake off during packaging.

Researchers reviewed 26 previous studies that looked at the amounts of microplastic particles in fish, shellfish, added sugars, salts, alcohol, tap or bottled water and air.

They then analysed how much of these foods people eat by looking at the recommended dietary intakes of the 2015 to 2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Many food and drink types were not tested and the study only looked at 15 per cent of total calorie intake.

“These estimates are subject to large amounts of variation; however, given methodological and data limitations, these values are likely underestimates,” researchers wrote in the paper.

“These data suggest that microplastics will continue to be found in the majority, if not all, items intended for human consumption.”

Professor Richard Lampitt, leader of the Microplastic Research Team at the National Oceanography Centre, who was not involved in the research, said; “I think the paper is a careful assessment of the data which has to date been published and that the conclusions are sound.”

However, other researchers have criticised the findings.

Professor Alastair Grant, professor of ecology at the University of East Anglia, said: “The authors calculate consumption of microplastics from measured concentrations in food and air.

“They calculate that an adult male consumes 142 plastic particles per day by mouth and inhales another 170. The rather large numbers that are given most prominence are annual estimates. No evidence is presented that these rates of consumption are a significant danger to human health.”

Dr Stephanie Wright, a research associate at King’s College London, said some of the included studies should be interpreted with caution.

“Size is an important parameter when considering the implications of (any) particle exposure. Without this information, it is difficult to interpret the current findings beyond the fact that we consume microplastics,” she said.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in