Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Leeds Bradford Airport scraps expansion plans amid climate crisis concerns

Proposals could have turned Yorkshire hub into second busiest in north but campaigners argued it was at odds with UK’s environmental commitments

Colin Drury
Yorkshire
Saturday 12 March 2022 19:56 EST
Comments
Artist’s impression of proposed terminal at Leeds Bradford Airport
Artist’s impression of proposed terminal at Leeds Bradford Airport (Leeds Bradford Airport)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Plans to massively expand one of the north’s busiest airports have been dropped following major protests about the possible climate ramifications.

Proposals for a new £150m terminal at Leeds Bradford Airport had previously been called in for a public inquiry by government inspectors.

But bosses now say they have spiked the plans because of the “excessive delays” that would be caused.

The massive 34,000 square metre facility would have paved the way for some 3 million more air passengers a year at the West Yorkshire hub, turning it into the second busiest airport in the north.

But campaigners – which included more than 75 separate climate groups and resident associations, as well as local MPs – said the expansion was entirely at odds with the UK’s pledge to tackle the climate crisis.

Reacting to the dropping of the plans, Chris Foren, chair of the Group for Action on Leeds Bradford Airport said it was a “victory for climate and communities”.

He said: “We are delighted that LBA has acknowledged defeat. It means that LBA cannot extend daytime flying hours nor remove night time flying controls. As they said in their own planning application, this means they don't have the capacity to increase passenger numbers above 5 million a year.

“Make no mistake, this victory is down to the thousands of people who took action, donated funds and never gave up hope that we can make the right decisions today to build a better tomorrow.”

Alex Sobel, Labour MP For Leeds North West, also said he was “pleased” at the decision.

“From the start this was always about increasing passenger numbers and carbon emissions not getting a new building,” he said. “I hope the airport will enter discussions about reducing aviation emissions now.”

Vincent Hodder, the airport’s chief executive, said the decision had been taken “with regret” – but he said he still hoped the hub would double its passenger numbers in the coming years.

He said the existing terminal would be expanded – as per a pre-existing planning application – to make it capable of accepting 7 million passengers a year.

“If we take the approvals that we already have and work with those in a really creative way, we’re able to move forward from now with certainty and deliver exactly what our customers need which is a modern decarbonised airport with the capacity for 7 million passengers,” he said.

He added that the current runway was only operating at 15 per cent its maximum capacity so, if the existing terminal was expanded, there would still be more opportunities for more flights.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in