Judges allow newts to stay at Duke's quarry
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Plans to shift a colony of newts to allow work to take place at a quarry owned by Britain's richest man, the Duke of Westminster, have been blocked by the Court of Appeal.
Plans to shift a colony of newts to allow work to take place at a quarry owned by Britain's richest man, the Duke of Westminster, have been blocked by the Court of Appeal.
Trustees for the Duke want to reopen a quarry at Halkyn Common near Holywell in Flintshire and start mining limestone. But water has built up in the old workings at Pen-yr-Henblas and now provide a home for around 200 great crested newts, a species protected under the 1981 Wildlife and Countryside Act and the European Habitats Directive. Destroying the newts or their habitat is a criminal offence.
The Duke's trustees applied to the Welsh Assembly for a licence to relocate the newts but were refused. A High Court judge overturned that decision, but yesterday three judges allowed an appeal by the Assembly, which had ruled that the need to move the newts was not an "overriding public interest" and the trustees had not proved there was a need for the limestone.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments