Inquiry opens into container port plan
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Britain's next big environmental battle began yesterday when a public inquiry opened into plans to build a deep-water container port at Dibden Bay, Hampshire, in the proposed New Forest National Park.
Britain's next big environmental battle began yesterday when a public inquiry opened into plans to build a deep-water container port at Dibden Bay, Hampshire, in the proposed New Forest National Park.
The scheme will be a test of official determination to push through big infrastructure projects without the huge delays that preceded the decision to build Terminal 5 at Heathrow airport.
Streamlined planning procedures which the Government will unveil shortly, and which could give permission for big projects by a simple vote in the House of Commons, have been drawn up with schemes such as Dibden Bay very much in mind.
A remarkably broad coalition of green groups insists the environmental damage incurred by constructing the port will far outweigh its economic benefits.
Dibden Bay is west of the port of Southampton. Associated British Ports, which owns the port, wants it to be the site of more than a mile of shipping berths and a 500-acre terminal. It believes the £600m, nine-year development is essential to maintain the prosperity of the port of Southampton, which it says is running out of space.
But environmentalists say the project would set a dangerous precedent and damage one of the most important estuaries in Europe.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments