Heathrow airport expansion 'will expose 1.6 million people to near constant noise'
Greenpeace report found there could be up to 47 flights passing over London every hour
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A third runway at Heathrow will expose 1.6 million people to “near constant” noise, according to an investigative report by Greenpeace.
Analysis found that there could be up to 47 flights passing over London every hour if expansion goes ahead.
Researchers looked at documents published earlier this year that showed the possible flight paths Heathrow officials are considering.
By overlaying these paths with population data, Greenpeace found more than 11 million people lived in areas set to be exposed to noise above 65 decibels which is about as loud as being in a busy office.
The 11 million figure is likely to be reduced when the final paths are agreed. However, 1.6 million people living in areas closest to the airport are almost certain to experience noise levels at or above 65 decibels.
Currently around 492,000 people experience 65 decibel noise or above from Heathrow, according to research published in 2016.
John Sauven, executive director of Greenpeace UK, said; “When an industrial development is opposed by local residents, they are often dismissed as Nimbys. But Heathrow’s backyard is bigger than the average city and needs to be listened to, ideally while it can still be heard over the scream of jet engines.
“This project is not in the interests of people living in the west of London. It is not in the interests of the UK economy. And it most certainly is not in the interests of the global climate.”
“The government has all the public support they could possibly want for radical climate action. Cancelling Heathrow is the easiest measure available. It will cut millions of tonnes of CO2 and improve the health prospects of millions of people all at the stroke of a pen.”
Next month a Heathrow consultation begins where the layout of terminal buildings will be discussed. The airport is already the biggest in Europe in terms of the number of passengers passing through.
A third runway, due to open in 2026, would increase takeoffs and landings from 480,000 each year to around 740,000.
A Heathrow spokesperson said: “As part of our extensive consultation process, we are proposing options that would reduce the airport’s noise impacts.
“Our plans are designed to ensure that fewer people will be affected by noise than were affected in 2013, thanks to quieter planes, quieter airport design, quieter operations and a 6.5 hour ban on scheduled night flights.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments