Government 'underestimates the intelligence of the public' over GM foods
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A report from The Economic and Social Research Council claims that the Government has underestimated the intelligence of the public over its policies on GM foods.
A report from The Economic and Social Research Council claims that the Government has underestimated the intelligence of the public over its policies on GM foods.
The critical report from the government-funded body says that the public believes that the Government is biased in favour of GM foods, on the grounds that the biotechnology industry may boost the UK economy, and called on the Government to declare GM foods unsafe until further research has been done. The report also says that public resistance to GM foods is rational and should be heeded.
On BBC Radio 4's Today programme Environment Minister Michael Meacher defended the Government's GM policy in the face of the report's criticisms.
'I certainly very strongly support openness, transparency, involving the public, bringing them into our confidence, telling them what we are doing, why we are doing it and asking them their opinion,' he said.
'But that of course is what we are trying to do: we have encouraged informal debate, we have increased the openness of the Government's advisory committee. 'The agendas, the minutes, the reports are all placed in the public domain.' Mr Meacher said the apparent gap between the Government and public's attitude towards GM technology 'partly reflects' the effect of food scares such as the BSE crisis.
'Understandably, I quite understand this, the public is sceptical.
'We do realise there are uncertainties, particularly about the effect of genetic modification on bio-diversity, on wildlife in the countryside.
'That is exactly why we have set up the farm scale evaluations, a four year programme to find out the facts and the truth.'
Nothing from those trials would be released into the human food chain until the Government was 'quite sure' about the effects of GM foods on humans and the countryside, Mr Meacher said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments