Activists launch another legal challenge against Cuadrilla fracking permit in High Court
Friends of the Earth say government agency failed in duty to promote use of 'best available techniques' to reduce environmental impact
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Activists are challenging a permit given to a fracking site in Lancashire in the latest legal test for the controversial fossil fuel extraction technique.
Friends of the Earth say the Environment Agency (EA) has failed in its duty to promote the use of the “best available techniques” to reduce the environmental impact of fracking.
They are launching a challenge in the High Court against the permission granted for oil and gas exploration company Cuadrilla to drill at their Preston New Road site.
Specifically, they argue that the EA should have considered the use of other techniques that produce less contaminated waste fluids when it considered Cuadrilla’s application in 2017.
Tony Bosworth, Friends of the Earth campaigner, said: “All along, the government stated that gold standard regulation would make fracking OK, but we believe our case, and the reality of what’s happening at Preston New Road, shows the opposite.
“They should be putting in place the best possible regulation to ensure that people, and the environment are protected.
“How can the government be considering rolling fracking out across the country, when it can’t be properly regulated at even one site? Isn’t it time the government gives up on fracking and backs renewables instead.”
“Flowback fluid” is produced at fracking sites after water is pumped into cracks in the rock to extract shale gas, and the liquid must be either reused or removed and processed at special facilities.
The campaigners say the EA should have considered a technique called “electrocoagulation”, which they say could produce cleaner fluid, before granting permission at the site.
Fracking at Preston New Road started in mid-October. It has since been a target for protesters and has been forced to halt drilling repeatedly after earth tremors at the site exceeded legal limits.
There have already been two unsuccessful attempts by protest groups to stop their operations.
The case is being held before Mr Justice Supperstone, and a ruling is expected within a few weeks.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments