Farmers 'should put food before wildlife'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Farmers have condemned moves to force them to leave fields uncultivated, warning that as much land as possible should be used to grow more crops and create jobs.
They also argued that plans to pay them to leave land fallow for wildlife could backfire and damage efforts to protect the environment.
Proposals have been floated by the Government to reintroduce a "set-aside" scheme similar to one abandoned two years ago.
Hilary Benn, the Environment Secretary, told the National Farmers' Union conference yesterday that action needed to be taken to tackle the fall in numbers of farmland birds.
But Peter Kendall, the NFU president, said the priority should be to boost food production. He said agriculture is one industry with reasonable prospects this year and should be at the heart of the economy.
Mr Kendall told the conference: "We are in a new era where we must produce more and at the same time impact on the environment less."
He warned that if his members were forced, under the rules for getting their subsidies, to introduce set-aside measures, many would be put off environment schemes which benefited the countryside through a range of measures such as planting hedges.
"Our proposed voluntary action plan is ambitious and we are determined it will achieve far more than any blunt regulatory stick," he said.
But the RSPB welcomed the government scheme, saying about 5 per cent of land would be needed for key projects, such as providing unsown plots in fields to help skylarks nest.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments