Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

EU split over size of emissions cut

Andrew Grice
Thursday 10 December 2009 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A damaging east-west split has opened up among EU countries over how quickly and deeply they should cut their carbon emissions to combat climate change.

At a two-day summit in Brussels which began last night, EU leaders were also divided about how much they should contribute to a global fund to help developing countries slow the growth in their emissions and switch to low-carbon industries.

Gordon Brown wants the EU to raise its commitment to reduce its emissions by 20 per cent from 1990 levels by 2020 to 30 per cent. But other EU leaders say they should not "jump first" and should wait to see what others offer at the summit in Copenhagen discussing a global deal on climate change. EU leaders may call a special meeting in Copenhagen to finalise their position as the summit reaches its climax next week.

Sweden , France and Germany back Britain's plan to raise the bar higher in order to put pressure on the rest of the world. But Poland and some other central and eastern-European states strongly oppose the move. Their industries are still heavily dependent on polluting fossil fuels such as coal.

Mikolaj Dowgielewicz, Poland's EU affairs minister, said a decision to move to a higher target at Copenhagen "cannot be made on political grounds". He said it should be agreed at the summit of EU leaders in March next year after an assessment by the European Commission.

One diplomat said: "There is a big division between the east and the west. The eastern-European countries feel they are being pressured into committing to something they cannot afford when western capitals really want to go as far as possible. But we will have to offer a lot of sweeteners to get our eastern members on board."

EU leaders also haggled over the Union's contribution to a global "adaptation and mitigator" fund for developing nations. Britain has offered €300m (£271m) a year for three years and France and Germany are expected to pay similar amounts. But some smaller EU members are reluctant to pay up.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in