Climate row scientist 'contemplated suicide'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The scientist at the centre of the "climategate" row contemplated suicide after hackers leaked his emails suggesting that he was selectively releasing information to fit his theories of climate change.
Professor Phil Jones, head of the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, said that it had been his "David Kelly moment" – a reference to the scientist who killed himself in the aftermath of the "sexed up" Iraq intelligence dossier claims. He also said that he had received death threats.
"I thought about suicide several times, but I think I've got past that stage now," he said, adding that family support had got him through the tough times.
The 57-year-old, who has lost a stone in weight and is on beta-blockers and sleeping pills, has stepped aside from his role as director of the unit while an inquiry takes place.
Hackers exposed the emails from Professor Jones just days before the Copenhagen climate summit in December. He acknowledged that he had not dealt with requests for climate data in "the right way", but said he was provoked by those obstructing his work into writing messages that his detractors claim called on colleagues to destroy or withdraw information. "It was just frustration. I thought the requests were just distractions."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments