Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Cars and pedestrians don't mix well, concludes study into shared-space schemes

Former Paralympian calls for an immediate moratorium on all such schemes

Tom Bawden
Friday 03 July 2015 14:13 EDT
Comments
A shared space scheme near a cluster of museums on Exhibition Road, London
A shared space scheme near a cluster of museums on Exhibition Road, London (Frantzesco Kangaris)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Traffic and pedestrians should no longer be made to share street space, as the modern trend for removing kerbs and road surface markings has turned town centres into “dangerous Third World traffic free-for-alls”, a former Paralympian has warned after conducting a review.

So-called shared-space schemes have sprung up in more than 100 areas in the UK, after local authorities adopted the counterintuitive idea of improving safety by removing the dividing lines between people and cars.

The idea, pioneered in the Netherlands, is that by putting buses, cars and lorries together with pedestrians, all parties are forced to co-operate and concentrate.

But a survey has found that most people are now against shared-space schemes.

“The reality is that people feel terrified to go in these areas – be they pedestrians or motorists – because nobody has the right of way,” said Lord Holmes, a gold-medal-winning Paralympic swimmer and Parliament’s sole blind member, who commissioned the survey.

“Town centres are being turned into dangerous Third World traffic free-for-alls, which is ridiculous,” he said. “We have travelled so far in our development and now we are taking huge steps backwards based on architectural conceit and planning folly.”

Lord Holmes’ survey of 600 people found that 63 per cent rated their experience of shared spaces as poor, with 35 per cent saying they avoided them altogether. One respondent described the concept of shared spaces as “lethally dangerous”, while a driver said it was an “absolute nightmare that I avoid if I can”.

Lord Holmes is calling for an immediate moratorium on all such schemes, which are also facing a legal challenge from five visually impaired people who are suing their local authorities for removing pedestrian crossings as part of shared-space projects.

A DfT spokesman said: “It is for local authorities to assess the suitability of introducing a shared-space scheme on their roads. As part of this we expect them to take into account the needs of the whole community, particularly disabled people.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in