Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

The ‘last resort’ material that can soak up CO2 directly from the air

The ‘crazy idea was thought up during the Covid-19 lockdown

Nina Massey
Wednesday 05 June 2024 11:29 EDT
Sample of activated charcoal used for CO2 capture (University of Cambridge/PA)
Sample of activated charcoal used for CO2 capture (University of Cambridge/PA)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A low-cost, energy-efficient method is capable of making materials that can capture carbon dioxide (CO2) directly from the air, new research suggests.

University of Cambridge researchers used a method similar to charging a battery to charge activated charcoal, which is often used in household water filters to filter contaminants.

By charging the charcoal sponge in this way, the researchers found the material could successfully capture CO2 directly from the air.

The charged charcoal sponge requires much lower temperatures to remove the captured CO2 so it can be stored, making it potentially more energy efficient than current carbon capture approaches, the researchers suggest.

Dr Alexander Forse from the Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, who led the study, said: “Capturing carbon emissions from the atmosphere is a last resort, but given the scale of the climate emergency, it’s something we need to investigate.

“The first and most urgent thing we’ve got to do is reduce carbon emissions worldwide, but greenhouse gas removal is also thought to be necessary to achieve net zero emissions and limit the worst effects of climate change.

“Realistically, we’ve got to do everything we can.”

He added: “This approach was a kind of crazy idea we came up with during the Covid-19 lockdowns, so it’s always exciting when these ideas actually work.

“This approach opens a door to making all kinds of materials for different applications, in a way that’s simple and energy-efficient.”

Carbon dioxide build-up in the atmosphere is entirely because of humans (Charlie Riedel/AP)
Carbon dioxide build-up in the atmosphere is entirely because of humans (Charlie Riedel/AP) (AP)

Current approaches for direct air capture – which uses sponge-like materials to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere – are expensive, and need high temperatures and the use of natural gas.

To collect the CO2 from the charcoal so it can be purified and stored, the material is heated.

In most materials currently used for CO2 capture from air, the materials need to be heated to temperatures as high as 900C.

But the charged charcoal sponges only require heating to 90-100C, temperatures that can be achieved using renewable electricity.

The materials are essentially heated from the inside out, making the process faster and less energy-intensive.

However, the materials do have limitations and researchers are working on how to increase the quantity of carbon dioxide that can be captured.

The researchers say their approach could be useful in fields beyond carbon capture since the pores in the charcoal and the ions inserted into them can be fine-tuned to capture a range of molecules.

The research, which is published in the journal Nature, was supported in part by the Leverhulme Trust, the Royal Society, the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), part of UK Research and Innovation (UKRI), and the Cambridge Centre for Climate Repair.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in