Vancouver to charge residents for a $750 security deposit to chop down trees on their own property
Vancouver City Council will introduce the move to make people replace the trees elsewhere
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A Canadian city has said any of its residents wanting to cut down a tree on their property must pay security deposit of up to $750 - which will only be returned if they plant a new one.
Vancouver City Council has proposed an amendment to its planning laws which will mean residents will be forced to pay deposits of $500 for removing a tree less than eight centimetres in diameter and $750 for a tree wider than eight centimetres.
The Parks and Recreation department has proposed the scheme after it estimated the city’s "tree canopy" has declined from 22.5 per cent in 1995 to 18 per cent in 2013 - mostly from the removal of trees on private property.
Current planning law requires residents to plant another tree somewhere else on a "one-for-one replacement" rule but the council found people were not planting it in the wrong location, planting a poor quality treee that would not survive or not planting it at all.
Local councillor Andrea Reimer insisted the council were not benefiting financially from the scheme as the money is paid back or used to plant trees elsewhere.
She told CBC News: "We were finding that people, even though there might be a requirement in their building permit to retain trees, we were finding that either they weren't, or that they were replanting them but the trees weren't living.
"Security deposits is an approach that's been used [elsewhere] and it seems like it would make a lot of sense here as well."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments