Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Bush pushes for plan to protect ozone layer

Geoffrey Lean,Environment Editor
Saturday 15 September 2007 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

George Bush is this week to press for international action that will do more to combat global warming than the Kyoto Protocol.

His administration is putting forward more radical proposals than any other government to phase out emissions of gases that help cause climate change, at talks in Montreal.

The move does not change the President's opposition to strict international curbs on carbon dioxide emissions – even though his chief scientist, Professor John Marburger, last week said that unless they were reduced the Earth would become "unlivable".

The new US proposals are directed against chemicals brought in to replace the CFCs (or chlorofluorocarbons) that destroy the world's vital ozone layer, which are being phased out.

These new chemicals – HCFCs or (hydrochlorofluorocarbons), used in refrigeration – are much less damaging to the ozone than those they replaced, but warm up the planet up to 1,700 times more quickly than carbon dioxide.

Their use is to stop in 2030 in rich nations and 2040 in poor ones, but the US wants both deadlines brought forward by a decade.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in