British Energy asks for £2.6bn discount on BNFL contract
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.British Nuclear Fuels suffered a fresh blow yesterday after its biggest customer, British Energy, demanded a £2.6bn reduction in the cost of its contracts with the Sellafield plant in Cumbria.
The nuclear power generator said it was in negotiations with BNFL to switch from reprocessing its spent fuel to storage, estimating that the move could reduce its charges by two-thirds. British Energy has £4bn worth of reprocessing contracts with BNFL and accounts for about a third of the baseload work for the Thorp reprocessing facility at Sellafield.
If BNFL is forced to end reprocessing of British Energy's spent fuel in addition to the loss of further contracts from its biggest overseas customer, Japan, then it will spell the death-knell for Sellafield. Michael Kirwan, British Energy's finance director, said: "As far as we are concerned, reprocessing is an economic nonsense and should stop straight away."
British Energy's chief executive, Peter Hollins, said that the £300m it paid BNFL for reprocessing last year would have been cut to £100m if the spent fuel had been stored instead. Mr Hollins said negotiations with BNFL were highly sensitive and would not put a timescale on how long they would take to complete, but he added: "We believe that ultimately BNFL will take the right commercial view. They have to recognise that it is in their interests that the nuclear generating industry remains fully competitive. We have had an encouraging meeting of minds."
Mr Hollins refused to be drawn on whether it would withdraw future business from BNFL if it refused to agree to reduce its charges. Last month Hugh Collum, the chairman of BNFL, conceded that it might have to "think the unthinkable" and end reprocessing at Sellafield although he insisted that reprocessing remained its preferred strategy.
The threat of losing the British Energy reprocessing contracts follows the cancellation of a multi-billion dollar nuclear clean-up contract with the US government. Bill Richardson, the US Energy Secretary, said the contract had been withdrawn because of "serious concerns" about BNFL's management and business approach.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments