Banks not moving fast enough to tackle climate and nature crises – campaigners
The latest report by responsible investment campaign group ShareAction says major European banks are still falling short on the environment.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Major European banks must do more to tackle the climate crisis, cut emissions and safeguard the world’s vital natural systems, campaigners have warned.
A report from ShareAction, which campaigns for responsible investment, assessed the 25 top banks in Europe and their approaches to climate change and nature loss.
It says that while there have been some improvements since the last survey in 2020, crucial gaps remain which should be urgently closed.
Despite all 25 banks committing their businesses to be net zero by 2050 – ensuring they have cut carbon pollution to zero overall by that date – the analysis suggests they are not doing enough to avert the climate crisis.
Very few banks are addressing the nature crisis, with targets for protecting and restoring biodiversity almost non-existent and limited integration of the issue in policies, it says.
The banks are paying far too little attention to the threat of biodiversity loss
There is also a lack of clarity over the scale of finance for the shift to a low carbon world, raising concerns over greenwashing, while a lack of transparency is leading to under-reporting of banks’ support for high-carbon sectors.
Banks have strengthened their fossil fuel policies but they still have loopholes which are minimising their impact – for example, while many of them are committed to phasing out coal, the policies may allow them to continue financing coal clients.
ShareAction is recommending banks set targets that will guarantee absolute reductions in emissions in the real economy, backed by effective fossil fuel policies, such as requiring companies to publish credible plans to phase out oil and gas, or comprehensive coal phase-out policies.
The ranking puts France’s BNP Paribas in top spot while Barclays and Lloyds Banking Group come out best among UK banks.
Peter Uhlenbruch, director of financial sector standards at ShareAction, said: “Despite important steps forward, the leadership of Europe’s top banks are not moving fast enough to drive the change needed to protect people and the planet.
“ShareAction has written to the chief executives of each of the banks with a set of tailored recommendations about how they can close loopholes in their climate and biodiversity strategies.
“Without robust decarbonisation targets underpinned by credible fossil fuel policies, these banks cannot fulfil their commitments to align their businesses with net-zero and prevent the worst impacts of the climate crisis.”
He warned: “The banks are paying far too little attention to the threat of biodiversity loss.
“Bank executives and their boards need to step up and take responsibility for the impact their activities are having on the ecosystems of the world’s oceans, forests and wildlife.”