Watchdog proposes new rules after series of audit failures
The Financial Reporting Council will introduce a new code for the Big Four auditors and some others next year.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Financial Reporting Council has announced plans to give independent board members similar powers across all of the Big Four auditing companies.
The regulator is proposing a new governance code which will slash the “considerable flexibility” that audit firms have to decide how they govern their business.
Plans for the new code, which will be under consultation before being introduced in 2022, come after several large companies failed despite having their audits signed off.
Public confidence and trust in audit has been damaged following high-profile corporate collapses
The FRC said: “Public confidence and trust in audit has been damaged following high-profile corporate collapses, in which the quality of the audit and the role of the auditors have been called into question.
“Perceptions of conflicts of interest persist, despite prohibitions on the provision of non-audit services to audit clients.”
It has led the Department for Business Energy & Industrial Strategy to propose a split between the parts of firms that audit clients and the part that provides consulting services, sometimes to the same clients.
The FRC said the last code, which started in 2016, gave companies flexibility to develop their own approaches, meaning their governance structures ended up being quite different.
It caused inconsistencies in the positions and activities of independent non-executives, a group of at least three people who are tasked with enhancing the confidence of stakeholders in some parts of the firm.
The FRC hopes that the new code will provide a clearer picture of what independent non-executives should do, and hand them more powers to demand information from the audit firms.
“Key to being an effective (independent non-executive) is timely access to information, and the ability to challenge senior leaders and influence decision-making,” the FRC said.
It will also separate the roles of board chairman and senior partner or chief executive.
These proposals will provide a springboard for further progress in improving audit quality and market resilience
FRC executive director of regulatory standards Mark Babington said: “Audit firms play a critical role in providing assurance to investors and other users of company reports to ensure their integrity and reliability.
“Well-governed audit firms that act in the public interest are more likely to deliver high-quality audit on a consistent basis.”
He added: “These proposals will provide a springboard for further progress in improving audit quality and market resilience.”