Unilever freezes fixed pay for top boss after shareholder revolt
Chief executive Hein Schumacher will not be eligible for a fixed pay increase in 2024 and 2025.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Unilever has said it is freezing its chief executive’s salary for the next two years after shareholders revolted over pay packages given to top bosses.
Hein Schumacher will not be eligible for a fixed pay increase in 2024 and 2025, the maker of Ben & Jerry’s and Hellmann’s said.
It comes after 58% of shareholder votes were cast against the group’s pay deals for directors at its annual general meeting in May.
Mr Schumacher, who took over at the helm in July, inherited one of the best paid chief executive roles in the FTSE 100 with an annual salary of 1.85 million euros (£1.62 million) as well as potential bonus and long-term incentive shares.
The decision on Monday means he will not have his fixed pay level reviewed until 2026.
Previous chief executive Alan Jope was handed 5.4 million euros (£4.7 million) last year, including a 3.7 million euro (£3.2 million) bonus, under the remuneration deal.
Unilever said it had spoken to shareholders and found that the “primary reason” for votes against the directors’ pay was “the approach taken to setting the incoming CEO’s (chief executive officer’s) remuneration on appointment”.
“Specifically, whilst the majority of shareholders agreed that the fixed pay level for the new CEO appropriately reflected the size and complexity of the role, there was a preference that alignment with the market could have been achieved gradually, rather than in one step on appointment,” it said.
Unilever also said it had started discussions with shareholders over the renewal of its remuneration policy in 2024, adding that the feedback so far had been “valuable” and will help shape final proposals.
Last week, Mr Schumacher said the consumer goods giant’s performance in recent years has “not matched our potential”.
Unilever revealed it was launching an “action plan” to drive growth, involving focusing on its 30 most profitable brands.