Review finds no evidence banks closed accounts due to ‘political views’
The Financial Conduct Authority said it will do more work to verify the data provided by banks and building societies.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.There is no evidence of banks denying politicians access to accounts over the last year due to their political views, a review by the regulator has said.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) said the evidence it has gathered “suggests that no firm closed an account between July 2022 and June 2023 primarily because of a customer’s political views”.
It said it plans to work further with banks, building societies and payment companies to verify the data they supplied and better understand why and when they close accounts due to reputational risk.
The probe was launched in August after Coutts Bank decided to end its relationship with former Ukip leader Nigel Farage.
Mr Farage claimed the account was shut due to his political opinions.
While no bank, building society or payment firm reported to us that they had closed accounts primarily due to someone’s political views, further work is needed for us to be sure
The financial institution took into account the fact his mortgage would shortly be paid off and also discussed potential “reputational risk to the bank”, an internal document compiled by Coutts showed.
The FCA acknowledged on Tuesday it had gathered information “at speed” and said it will do more to “address gaps in the data”.
“While no bank, building society or payment firm reported to us that they had closed accounts primarily due to someone’s political views, further work is needed for us to be sure,” FCA chief executive Nikhil Rathi said.
The FCA said it will focus on “outlier firms” when ensuring the data provided is accurate.
It will also look into why there are 1.1 million people in the UK who do not have a bank account and what kind of people fall into this category.
An important question for policy makers is whether all individuals, businesses and organisations should have the right to an account, as is the case in some other countries
“As we undertake that work, the time is also right for a debate on how we balance access to bank accounts with the threat of financial crime, as well as firms’ reasonable risk and commercial appetites,” Mr Rathi said.
“An important question for policy makers is whether all individuals, businesses and organisations should have the right to an account, as is the case in some other countries.
“What’s more, international comparisons suggest robust digital identities could play an important role not only in countering financial crime but also in aiding financial inclusion.”