Minister admits resolving rail disputes would have been cheaper than strikes

Rail minister Huw Merriman told MPs the row has ‘ended up costing more’.

Neil Lancefield
Wednesday 18 January 2023 06:29 EST
The Government has lost more money due to the impact of rail strikes than it would have cost to settle the disputes months ago, a minister has admitted (PA)
The Government has lost more money due to the impact of rail strikes than it would have cost to settle the disputes months ago, a minister has admitted (PA) (PA Wire)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Government has lost more money due to the impact of rail strikes than it would have cost to settle the disputes months ago, a minister has admitted.

Rail minister Huw Merriman told MPs the row has “ended up costing more” but insisted the “overall impact” on all public sector pay deals must be considered.

Transport Select Committee member Ben Bradshaw put it to Mr Merriman that “we’re talking of a cost to the Government of over a billion (pounds) so far” from the impact of strikes, which have repeatedly decimated services for several months.

It’s actually ended up costing more than would have been the case if it was just settled

Huw Merriman

He went on to ask: “That would easily be enough money to have solved this dispute months ago, wouldn’t it?”

The minister replied: “If you look at it in that particular lens, then absolutely, it’s actually ended up costing more than would have been the case if it was just settled in that part.

“But, again, we have to look at the overall impact on the public sector pay deals that are going across, and we also have to look on the ability for the reforms that don’t often get talked about, but they’re absolutely vital as part of the package.

I believe that we’ve been able to intervene positively

Huw Merriman

“It’s the reforms that will actually pay for these pay deals and also make the railway more efficient in the long run as well.”

Mr Merriman insisted the Government has not “interfered in a negative manner” during negotiations aimed at resolving the row over jobs, pay and conditions.

He said: “I believe that we’ve been able to intervene positively.

“We’ve been able to refresh mandates. That has led to settlements with the TSSA (Transport Salaried Staffs’ Association) and Unite.

“I very much hope that will lead to settlement with the RMT, that have been responsible for 70% of industrial action over the last year.

“There are talks going on this morning between the Rail Delivery Group and the RMT, and there have been talks going on last week and into this week with the RMT and Network Rail.

“So, I’m really hopeful that those talks will lead to a settlement.”

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in