Microsoft facing £1 billion legal claim from UK businesses
A legal action filed at the Competition Appeal Tribunal claims Microsoft overcharged users of rival cloud platforms for access to its Windows Server.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Microsoft is facing a £1 billion legal action from UK businesses over claims it overcharged firms for access to products.
A claim filed to the Competition Appeal Tribunal alleges customers using rival cloud computing platforms to Microsoft’s own Azure were charged higher licensing fees to access its Windows Server.
It alleges that UK businesses and organisations are collectively owed more than £1 billion in compensation for being overcharged, and that Microsoft has used anti-competitive practices to try to force customers to move to its cloud computing services.
The claim has been filed by digital markets regulation and policy expert Dr Maria Luisa Stasi and law firm Scott+Scott, with all UK businesses who bought licences for Windows Server via rival cloud platforms such as Amazon’s AWS, Google Cloud Platform and Alibaba Cloud being represented in the “opt-out” collective action.
Collective actions level the playing field and allow organisations to fight back against anti-competitive behaviour from some of the biggest companies in the world
“Put simply, Microsoft is punishing UK businesses and organisations for using Google, Amazon and Alibaba for cloud computing by forcing them to pay more money for Windows Server,” Dr Stasi said.
“By doing so, Microsoft is trying to force customers into using its cloud computing service Azure and restricting competition in the sector.
“This lawsuit aims to challenge Microsoft’s anti-competitive behaviour, push them to reveal exactly how much businesses in the UK have been illegally penalised, and return the money to organisations that have been unfairly overcharged.”
James Hain-Cole, partner at Scott+Scott UK, said: ““Collective actions level the playing field and allow organisations to fight back against anti-competitive behaviour from some of the biggest companies in the world.
“Dr Stasi’s case against Microsoft aims to do exactly that. We are proud to support her efforts to secure compensation for the class and hold Microsoft to account for its conduct that affects businesses and organisations across the UK economy.”
Microsoft has been approached for comment.