Indefensible if Government ‘fiddles figures’ to uprate benefits – campaigners
Benefits must be uprated in the usual way using September’s inflation figure, campaigning organisations have said.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Campaigners have warned the Government it would be “indefensible” to use the latest lower inflation figures to uprate benefits, describing it as a “big cut” for struggling families.
Chancellor Jeremy Hunt must raise benefits by inflation “in the usual way”, using the September figure of 6.7%, charity Action for Children has said.
Organisations have expressed concerns about reports that the Government might use October’s lower figure of 4.6%.
The Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF) said that, should this happen, it would be a move to “fiddle the figures and hide a big cut”.
Treasury minister Gareth Davies refused to guarantee the September figure would be used.
He told ITV’s Good Morning Britain: “I am not going to speculate what may or may not be in the autumn statement.
“But I would point out that we did uprate benefits by quite some considerable margin earlier this year. But it’s not appropriate for me to comment ahead of the autumn statement.”
Organisations working with families and children have already expressed concern in recent weeks that benefits are not covering costs for some of the lowest-income households.
Last month, a letter from Save the Children, the Trussell Trust food bank network, the JRF, Action for Children, Citizen’s Advice and The Children’s Society, urged Conservative MPs to demand Mr Hunt “do the right thing” by uprating benefits at least in line with September’s inflation figure.
JRF chief analyst, Peter Matejic, said many families “live in a world where their income, in many cases, simply doesn’t cover costs, while the Government talks about cutting their support further”.
He added: “It’s indefensible that the Government is reportedly considering cutting the benefits of struggling families worried for their future, with news stories suggesting it plans to use today’s figures, instead of last month’s, to fiddle the figures and hide a big cut.
“In the upcoming autumn statement benefits must be increased in line with inflation and Local Housing Allowance (LHA) must be unfrozen to support private renters with their housing costs.
“The Chancellor should also take steps to ensure that Universal Credit, at a minimum, always enables people to afford the essentials.”
Action for Children’s chief executive, Paul Carberry, said while the inflation fall might be “mission accomplished for Government”, the cost of living crisis “is getting worse for many of the families we see every day”.
He added: “With winter approaching, the continued financial pressures on low-income parents will only get worse, meaning yet more children going cold and hungry.
“The Chancellor must use the autumn statement to protect families with children from these intense and ongoing pressures on household finances. At the very least, he must raise benefits by inflation in the usual way using the September figure and reform Cost of Living Payments to account for family size.”