‘Grown-up debate’ needed about future of Grangemouth, says Petroineos boss

Politicians and trade unions have hit out at the decision to close the refinery.

Craig Paton
Monday 25 November 2024 05:59 EST
The refinery will close next year (Andrew Milligan/PA)
The refinery will close next year (Andrew Milligan/PA) (PA Wire)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A “grown-up debate” is required about the future of the Grangemouth refinery, a senior official from its owners has said.

Petroineos announced in September the refinery will close in the second quarter of next year, putting 400 jobs at risk.

Both the Scottish and UK governments as well as trade unions have hit out at the announcement, with Petroineos repeatedly being urged to pause the decision to allow for a transition.

It is not too late for us all to co-develop a bright future for Grangemouth, producing low-carbon fuel and eventually creating hundreds of jobs here again

Iain Hardie

The firm claims it is making heavy losses at the site, with a £150 million loss expected this year.

Writing in the Daily Record, regional head of legal and external affairs at Petroineos Iain Hardie said it was “not too late” to develop a future for the site, but he lamented the tone of the debate since the announcement.

“The men and women who work at Grangemouth deserve a more intelligent debate about their future than the one being played out by politicians and trade unions, who are naturally defensive at having missed the opportunities we gave them several years ago to talk to us about an orderly and fair transition away from fossil fuels to cleaner energy,” he wrote.

“Despite meaningless statements about pausing the closure or confusing suggestions that the refinery can become a biofuels plant overnight, politicians and the trade unions have left it too late.

“But it is not too late for us all to co-develop a bright future for Grangemouth, producing low-carbon fuel and eventually creating hundreds of jobs here again.”

Mr Hardie added: “If we want to seize new opportunities, rebuild Grangemouth as a modern, thriving manufacturing site and treat the workforce with respect and fairness, we urgently need a more grown-up debate that focuses more on the future than on the past.

“We will all be failing if we don’t make that happen. We have long been ready to play our part.”

A letter from Sharon Graham, the general secretary of the trade union Unite, to UK Energy Secretary Ed Miliband last week said the refinery could be converted to produce sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) “relatively easily”, something Petroineos rejects.

Later in the week, the union’s Scotland regional secretary told MSPs the company’s books gave a “distorted picture” of the financial situation at the plant, which the firm also rejected.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in