Global energy support not targeted enough, warns OECD
The secretary-general of the organisation said support measures need to be targeted at the right people.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Governments need to better target financial support to avoid wasting money and “entrenching” undesirable consumer spending behaviour, a world trade group has said.
Mathias Cormann, secretary-general of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), said it is important for all nations to work to bring down inflation.
But such measures need to be targeted at the right people, and temporary, he warned.
Our message to everyone is to really focus on making these support efforts more targeted in the future
He said: “Fiscal support measures are not targeted enough.
“It is one thing to respond to the initial shock – and of course there is a need for speed, and to stabilise things quickly – but of course, now it is becoming clear that the challenging situation is going to be more sustained.
“To keep non-targeted measures in place for a long period will obviously be very expensive, and it will entrench distortions in terms of impacts on consumer behaviour and investment behaviour that would not be entirely desirable.”
He said energy support in particular is falling into the pockets of those who do not need it, which could end up being costly for governments.
In the UK, the Government’s Energy Price Guarantee caps bills at around £2,500 for the typical household until April, with most homes getting a discount of £400 off their electricity bills from October.
The fight against inflation is extremely important and we need to get it under control, it is hurting households and hurting real people. It is a crucial priority
Mr Cormann went on: “In terms of energy in particular, it would be much better if fiscal support working to cushion the impact on the vulnerable was managed on the income support side of the equation, rather than on the price support side.
“Inevitably, price support has more blanket application, and goes to many people in firms who perhaps do not need it as much as others.
“The question, really, is whether that is the most appropriate use of resources.
“Our message to everyone is to really focus on making these support efforts more targeted in the future.”
The remarks come after the OECD published a report which showed the UK economy will contract the most out of the world’s seven most advanced nations next year. It is expected to shrink by 0.4% in 2023 and grow by just 0.2% in 2024.
The organisation also stressed the importance of international governments making “decisive” monetary policy decisions, meaning raising interest rates to control runaway inflation.
OECD interim chief economist Alvaro Santos Pereira used the example of Brazil, saying its central bank acted decisively, which is “paying off” with inflation coming down steadily.
Mr Cormann added: “The fight against inflation is extremely important and we need to get it under control, it is hurting households and hurting real people. It is a crucial priority.
“Central banks must do what needs to be done to get inflation under control.
“But fiscal policy also needs to be well aligned with monetary policy objectives and not add to inflation.”