‘Dysfunctional’ Companies House facilitating fraud, finance chiefs say
The director of international illicit finance at UK Finance and fraud bosses at banks NatWest and HSBC took aim at the online register of companies.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The fraud leader at trade body UK Finance has said that the Government needs to fix the “dysfunctional” Companies House because it is helping to facilitate business fraud.
Nick Van Benschoten, the director of international illicit finance at UK Finance, and fraud bosses at banks NatWest and HSBC took aim at the online register of UK-based companies.
Mr Van Benschoten said: “Companies House is supposed to be a key part of the information infrastructure underpinning the business environment.
“At the moment it is a dysfunctional part, and other people cannot compensate for that.
“The Government needs to get it right first time, and then we can help and build on that.
“But at the moment I’m afraid it’s not an efficient feature.”
The remarks came during a Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) Committee examining fraudulent company registrations, in particular fraudsters’ using victims’ home addresses to register a fake firm.
Graham Barrow, a money laundering expert who directs The Dark Money Files podcast, stressed that there is a big proportion of people being harmed from fake companies registering on Companies House and stealing identities to do so.
He said: “We have a very significant problem of shell companies, or “burner” companies, who are doing short-term fraudulent activity and then disappear.
“Some people find that their houses are being stolen from under their noses.”
He said that about half of companies registered on the database are lost after just a few years, suggesting that many were set up under fraudulent circumstances.
“You have to provide verification of your identity to borrow a library book,” he added.
“You don’t have to do that to create a company which could cause tens of thousands of pounds worth of damage to our economy.”
Fraud directors at HSBC and NatWest reiterated that the lack of checks for people setting up a business through Companies House is making it harder for banks to stamp down on fraud.
Donald Toon, the head of risk threat mitigation at NatWest, said: “We have a real issue here because we are obliged to verify accounts, we look at Companies House data as part of that verification process.
“And then the obligation is then on us to tell Companies House whether there is a difference between what we are told and what is on their database.”
Mr Toon stressed that about 6,000 staff, or 9% of its workforce, work to prevent economic crime at the bank every day.
It spends about £500 million a year on fraud prevention, and it is also set to pay an economic crime levy on top of those costs.
“Please don’t go away with any suggestion that banks don’t spend money, and don’t put a lot of effort into this”, he said.
A new Economic Crime Bill is currently going through the House of Commons and proposes major reforms to Companies House.
Martin Swain, a director at Companies House, responded to the discussion: “I would love to see in three or four years time that we are not getting the negative press coverage we get, and that we are a “facilitator of fraud”.
“That is not where we want to be as an agency, we want to be a preventer of fraud.”