Davey: Cutting winter fuel allowance is Government’s ‘first big mistake’

The Lib Dem leader said Labour MPs and others across the House will be ‘genuinely worried’ about the move after correspondence with constituents.

Claudia Savage
Thursday 29 August 2024 07:50 EDT
Liberal Democrats leader Sir Ed Davey has said his party will attempt to reverse the Government’s proposed move to end the winter fuel allowance to some pensioners (Lucy North/PA)
Liberal Democrats leader Sir Ed Davey has said his party will attempt to reverse the Government’s proposed move to end the winter fuel allowance to some pensioners (Lucy North/PA) (PA Wire)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Liberal Democrats leader Sir Ed Davey has said his party will attempt to block the Government’s proposed move to end the winter fuel allowance to some pensioners, describing the move as the new administration’s “first big mistake”.

Sir Ed said Labour MPs and others across the House will be “genuinely worried” about the move after correspondence with constituents.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves said the Government is withdrawing winter fuel payments from millions of pensioner households not in receipt of benefits.

Ms Reeves defended that decision, which she blamed on a £22 billion black hole in the public finances inherited from the Conservatives, stating: “it’s not a decision I wanted to make.”

The policy is expected to reduce the number of pensioners in receipt of the up-to-£300 payment by 10 million, from 11.4 million to 1.5 million, saving some £1.4 billion this financial year.

The Liberal Democrat leader said the move would “hit millions” so a vote in Parliament is needed.

He told the BBC: “We haven’t had a vote. We haven’t had a proper debate. So what all the 72 Liberal Democrat MPs have done, we’re signing what’s called a prayer, which is a parliamentary process, to trigger a debate so we can represent people who have elected us.

“Liberal Democrats said, in the election, we’d fight for a fair deal for people, for our communities and I think the least the Parliament needs to do is have a debate, have a vote and hopefully reject this proposal.

The Government have got a legacy from the Conservatives which is really, really tough, but I don't think the way to balance the books is to take away this crucial support for millions of pensioners, just as we're going into winter when fuel bills are going up

Ed Davey, Lib Dems

“It looks like the Government’s first big mistake, and I think pensioners will be going into this winter, really worried if Parliament doesn’t stop the Government from doing this.”

Sir Ed said the party would be attempting to call for a vote on the measure in the two weeks after the Commons returns before going on recess again for party conference season.

The Lib Dem leader said he hoped Tory MPs would also “back the vote”.

He said: “I think there’ll be some Labour MPs and MPs probably across all parties. I think people are genuinely worried. They’ll be talking to people in their constituencies. They’ll have heard the concerns of a number of the groups who represent pensioners.”

He added: “I hope MPs from all parties will get behind this sort of idea. We do need to fight for pensioners.

“Now we all know there’s a budget problem. Let’s be frank about that, the Government have got a legacy from the Conservatives which is really, really tough, but I don’t think the way to balance the books is to take away this crucial support for millions of pensioners, just as we’re going into winter when fuel bills are going up.”

As well as the expected rise in fuel costs coming into the winter months, the average household energy bill is to increase by £149 from October after Ofgem said it was increasing its price cap.

It means the price cap will increase by 10% from the current £1,568 for a typical household in England, Scotland and Wales to £1,717.

Sir Ed said there were “other choices” available to balance the books saying his party would support getting the “very wealthiest in our country to pay more” to fund investment in public services.

He said: “I hope we can persuade, by the force of our argument, the Government to think again on this. It’s not too late.”

He added: “Let’s have that debate. Let’s have that vote. I’m sure there are Labour MPs who feel very uncomfortable, who will agree with the Liberal Democrats that this is the Government’s first big mistake.

“So, yeah, give the Chancellor the chance to think again, I’m sure she’s big enough to do that.”

Charity Age UK said it “strongly” opposes means-testing the payment because it means “as many as two million pensioners who badly need the money to stay warm this winter will not receive it and will be in serious trouble as a result”.

Stuart Andrew MP, Opposition chief whip, said: “The Conservatives have already submitted a Motion to challenge the Government to hold a debate on Winter Fuel Payments. The Liberal Democrats should back those plans.”

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in