Barclay: Plans for price caps on food staples have ‘no element of compulsion’
Downing Street is understood to be drawing up proposals that would seek to get retailers charging the lowest possible amount for some basic products.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Government plans to encourage supermarkets to impose price caps on food staples to help with the cost of living will have no “element of compulsion”, a Cabinet minister has said.
Downing Street is understood to be drawing up proposals that would seek to get retailers charging the lowest possible amount for some basic products like bread and milk.
The opt-in scheme, modelled on a similar agreement in France, would allow supermarkets to select which items they would cap, the Sunday Telegraph reported.
It has been compared with pricing controls introduced by Edward Heath in the 1970s to curb inflation, though No 10 has stressed any initiative would be voluntary.
Asked about the proposals on the BBC’s Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg programme, Health Secretary Steve Barclay said: “My understanding is the Government is working constructively with supermarkets as to how we address the very real concerns around food inflation and the cost of living, and doing so in a way that is also very mindful to the impact on suppliers.”
Mr Barclay said small family-run businesses would themselves be under “significant pressure” and that the plans are “not about any element of compulsion”.
The voluntary aspect of the proposals has led critics to question whether they would have any effect on prices.
A No 10 source said the proposal is at “drawing board stage” but will not involve Government-imposed price controls.
Shadow work and pensions secretary Jonathan Ashworth said: “It is extraordinary. Rishi Sunak is now like a sort of latter-day Edward Heath with price controls.”
It comes after Chancellor Jeremy Hunt backed interest rate hikes – even if they risk of plunging the UK into recession – in order to combat soaring inflation.
Although down from 10.1% in March, the Consumer Prices Index of inflation remained stubbornly high at 8.7% in April, while experts have warned alarmingly expensive food is set to overtake energy bills as the “epicentre” of the cost-of-living crisis.
Right-wing think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA) suggested the plans amount to a “pointless gimmick” and the British Retail Consortium (BRC) warned of a “muddle of regulation”.
Andrew Opie, director of food and sustainability at the BRC, said: “This will not make a jot of difference to prices.
“Supermarkets have always run on very slim margins, especially when compared with other parts of the food supply chain, but profits have fallen significantly in the last year.
“Even so, retailers continue to invest heavily in lower prices for the future, expanding their affordable food ranges, locking the price of many essentials, and raising pay for staff.
“As commodity prices drop, many of the costs keeping inflation high are now arising from the muddle of new regulation coming from Government.
“Rather than recreating 1970s-style price controls, the Government should focus on cutting red tape so that resources can be directed to keeping prices as low as possible.”
IEA economics fellow Julian Jessop said: “Caps on food prices are at best a pointless gimmick and, at worst, harmful to the very people they are supposed to help.
“It is not even certain that the prices of capped goods would end up lower than if there were no cap.
“Supermarkets may simply price to the cap, and not cut prices further even if falling costs allowed it. Strong competition should prevent this, but it would incentivise supermarkets to cut their prices anyway, making price controls pointless.
“The Government will hope that this is enough to show that it is ‘doing something’ about food inflation but it could just encourage calls for more intervention, including making the caps legally mandated as with the energy price cap, and extending to other sectors like housing in the form of rent controls.”